THE EFFECT OF SEDIMENT REMOVAL TIME ON SEDIMENT QUALITY OF NILE TILAPIA NURSERY POND
Wudtisin. I1*, Pichitkul. P1, Sirisuay. S1, 1Paankhao. N
1Faculty of Fisheries, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand
*Corresponding author: idsariya.w@ku.th
Pond preparation is always essential for earthen pond farmers to reduce the risk of poor bottom soil qualities. Bottom soil or sediment relates to pond water quality and affects fish yield. In addition, sediment deposition occurs continuously underneath the pond due to the accumulation of dead organisms, uneaten feed, and fish feces. The sediment degradation by microbial activity under anoxic condition can generate reduced substance such as hydrogen sulfide to the water column. The sediment removal between crops is one of the farmer practices. The suitable time interval to remove sediment depends on the quality of the residue sediment after harvest. This research aims to determine the proper interval time to remove sediment in the tilapia nursing ponds. Each pond was stocked with 600,000–800,000 individual sex reversal Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) per pond. Fish were raised in the suspended net cage hanging in the pond (10,000-12,000 fish/cage). Each pond has different sediment removal times. Sediment removal took place at three-year intervals for each pond.Sediment in the pond, namely C3, was removed in the early of the year 2022, while sediment in C2 was removed in year 2021, and sediment deposition in C1 was removed in year 2020. The ponds were dried approximately 1-2 weeks after sediment removal. The sediment was compositely sampled from each tilapia nursing pond. The basic water quality indicators in three ponds were measured, reporting in dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity, salinity, total dissolved solids, turbidity, nitrite, nitrate, total ammonia and orthophosphate, ranging from 3.3-5.3 mg/L, 6.4-6.9, 178-301 µs/cm, 0.1-0.2 ppt, 119-202 mg/L, 19-35 NTU, 0.006-0.018 mg/L N, 0.022-0.055 mg/L N, 0.409-0.558 mg/L N, and 0.041-0.094 mg/L P, respectively. The sediment from each pond was triplicately analyzed and statistically tested. The sediment pH among ponds did not differ statistically (p>0.05). The sediment pH from all ponds was slightly acidic, ranging 6.73-6.78. The organic matter percentage from C1 was the highest and significantly different from C3 (P<0.05). The percentage of sediment water content, sediment nitrite, and sediment nitrate from C1 also differ statistically from C2 and C3 (P<0.05). Total ammonia in sediment was significantly lowest in C3, with an average of 3.34 + 0.15 mg N/Kg dry sediment. Orthophosphate in sediment has a similar trend to total ammonia deposition. The concentration of orthophosphate accumulated in the pond bottom was 0.042 + 0.002 mg P/Kg dry sediment, of which C3 had the lowest concentration. The correlation of the sediment indices was investigated. The percentage of water content in sediment was highly related to sediment nitrate (r = 0.881, P< 0.01). The percentage of organic matter accumulated in the bottom pond has a high relationship with nutrients in sediment; nitrite (r=0.752, P<0.05), total ammonia (r=0.758, P<0.05), and orthophosphate (r=0.700, P<0.05). The optimum organic matter percentage for aquacultural ponds was 1-3, and the optimum pond soil pH ranged 7.5-8.5 recommended by Boyd et al. (1998) and Boyd et al. (2002). This finding can be summarized that the organic matter and sediment pH from all ponds was unsuitable. Although the latest sediment removal pond was in early this year, the concentration of the organic matter was still out of the optimum range. The concentration of organic matter increases with time. The high accumulation of organic matter is related to anoxic conditions beneath the water. The overall sediment qualities between ponds C2 and C3 were similar, while the sediment qualities in C1 differed from the other two ponds due to sediment removal last in year 2020. The sediment removal time interval might be considered to change from a 3-year interval to a 2-year interval. The additional practices during pond preparation should be considered carefully. The proper amount of lime application is necessary. Lime requirement calculation should be applied.
Keywords: Sediment removal, Sediment quality, Nile Tilapia